Does OpenAgents or Cursor have a free plan?

OpenAgents is a paid tool. Cursor is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

OpenAgents vs Cursor

Q: Can I use OpenAgents and Cursor together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine OpenAgents and Cursor with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated June 2026

OpenAgents

XLang Lab

Autopilot online. An open platform for language agents in the wild.

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

83% data quality

Cursor

Anysphere

Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.

0.0(0)

G2 4.5★(24)

FREEMIUM

80% data quality

Trust & Reliability

OpenAgents

Users:1K-10K

Cursor

Uptime:99.62%Status page

Customers (per vendor):Y Combinator, NVIDIA, Stripe +2

GDPR

Overall Winner: Cursor

8.0/10 vs OpenAgents at 5.5/10

Leads in:

Output Quality

Ease of Use

Customizability

AI Comparison Summary

OpenAgents

5.5

avg score

Cursor

8.0

avg score

Cursor leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Output Quality and 2 more.

OpenAgents has an edge in Value for Money.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Cursor

8.0 / 10

OpenAgents

Best For

Deploying autonomous language agents for developers

Building AI agents with tool-use capabilities

Orchestrating multi-step tasks with language models

Developing code generation agents

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking a no-code agent builder

Simple, single-step automation tasks

Users requiring extensive out-of-the-box integrations without custom development

Cursor

Best For

Individual developers seeking AI-powered coding assistance

Engineering teams aiming to accelerate development cycles

Organizations needing advanced code review and debugging tools

Developers working with complex or large codebases

Not Ideal For

Beginner programmers who prefer a simpler, non-AI-assisted environment

Teams strictly requiring on-premise or fully self-hosted AI models for all operations

Users who prefer a lightweight text editor over a full-featured IDE

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

OpenAgents is best for

🤖Automation & Agents7.0

Cursor is best for

💻Coding & Dev10.0🤖Automation & Agents7.0✍️Writing & Content3.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

OpenAgents

Pros

Open-source with Apache-2.0 license, offering flexibility and transparency
Provides a platform for deploying and managing various language agents
Supports advanced capabilities like tool learning and code generation
Designed for multi-agent orchestration

Cons

Requires technical expertise for setup and customization
Limited information available on specific integrations and advanced features from the website
No clear human-in-the-loop features mentioned
Community support might be the primary support channel

Cursor

Pros

Significantly boosts developer productivity
Deep codebase understanding for accurate AI assistance
Supports a wide range of cutting-edge AI models
Integrates seamlessly into existing developer workflows (GitHub, Slack)
Offers robust enterprise-grade security and compliance features
Provides flexible deployment across desktop, CLI, web, and mobile

Cons

Requires developers to adapt to an AI-first IDE workflow
Advanced features and integrations are primarily for paid tiers
Reliance on external LLM providers for core AI capabilities
Potential for high switching costs due to deep integration into development environment
No explicit mention of on-premise deployment for core product

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

OpenAgents

5.5

/ 10

Cursor

8.0

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

OpenAgents

3.0

Cursor

8.0▲ +5.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

OpenAgents

7.0

Cursor

9.0▲ +2.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

OpenAgents

10.0▲ +2.0

Cursor

8.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

OpenAgents

7.0

Cursor

8.0▲ +1.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

OpenAgents

5.0

Cursor

7.0▲ +2.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

OpenAgents

1.0

Cursor

8.0▲ +7.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, OpenAgents or Cursor?

Both are strong options. OpenAgents has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Cursor has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is OpenAgents cheaper than Cursor?

OpenAgents starts at free (open_source model). Cursor starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between OpenAgents and Cursor?

OpenAgents — "Autopilot online. An open platform for language agents in the wild.". Cursor — "Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use OpenAgents and Cursor together?

Explore Alternatives

OpenAgents Alternatives

Tools similar to OpenAgents

Cursor Alternatives

Tools similar to Cursor

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.