Does OpenAGI or Cursor have a free plan?

OpenAGI is a paid tool. Cursor is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

OpenAGI vs Cursor

Q: Can I use OpenAGI and Cursor together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine OpenAGI and Cursor with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated June 2026

OpenAGI

Rutgers University

Orchestrate diverse AI agents for complex, multi-domain problem-solving.

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

83% data quality

Cursor

Anysphere, Inc.

Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.

0.0(0)

G2 4.7★(20)

FREEMIUM

66% data quality

Trust & Reliability

OpenAGI

Trust data not available yet

Cursor

Customers (per vendor):Stripe, OpenAI, Datadog +7

GDPR

SOC 2

Overall Winner: Cursor

8.0/10 vs OpenAGI at 5.7/10

Leads in:

Output Quality

Ease of Use

Customizability

AI Comparison Summary

OpenAGI

5.7

avg score

Cursor

8.0

avg score

Cursor leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Output Quality and 1 more.

OpenAGI has an edge in Value for Money.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Cursor

8.0 / 10

OpenAGI

Best For

Building advanced AI agent systems for research

Experimenting with multi-agent collaboration

Developing autonomous problem-solving agents

Researchers exploring agentic AI architectures

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking a no-code solution

Production-critical applications without dedicated support

Simple, single-step automation tasks

Cursor

Best For

Individual developers seeking AI-powered coding assistance

Engineering teams aiming to accelerate development cycles

Organizations needing advanced code review and debugging tools

Developers working with complex or large codebases

Not Ideal For

Beginner programmers who prefer a simpler, non-AI-assisted environment

Teams strictly requiring on-premise or fully self-hosted AI models for all operations

Users who prefer a lightweight text editor over a full-featured IDE

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

OpenAGI is best for

🤖Automation & Agents7.7

Cursor is best for

💻Coding & Dev10.0🤖Automation & Agents7.0✍️Writing & Content3.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

OpenAGI

Pros

Open-source and extensible for customization
Designed for advanced AI research and experimentation
Supports orchestration of diverse, specialized agents
Community-driven development and support

Cons

Requires strong technical and AI research expertise
May lack enterprise-grade features and support
Steep learning curve for beginners
Limited pre-built integrations without custom development

Cursor

Pros

Significantly boosts developer productivity
Deep codebase understanding for accurate AI assistance
Supports a wide range of cutting-edge AI models
Integrates seamlessly into existing developer workflows (GitHub, Slack)
Offers robust enterprise-grade security and compliance features
Provides flexible deployment across desktop, CLI, web, and mobile

Cons

Requires developers to adapt to an AI-first IDE workflow
Advanced features and integrations are primarily for paid tiers
Reliance on external LLM providers for core AI capabilities
Potential for high switching costs due to deep integration into development environment
No explicit mention of on-premise deployment for core product

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

OpenAGI

5.7

/ 10

Cursor

8.0

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

OpenAGI

3.0

Cursor

8.0▲ +5.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

OpenAGI

7.0

Cursor

9.0▲ +2.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

OpenAGI

10.0▲ +2.0

Cursor

8.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

OpenAGI

7.0

Cursor

8.0▲ +1.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

OpenAGI

6.0

Cursor

7.0▲ +1.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

OpenAGI

1.0

Cursor

8.0▲ +7.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, OpenAGI or Cursor?

Both are strong options. OpenAGI has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Cursor has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is OpenAGI cheaper than Cursor?

OpenAGI starts at free (open_source model). Cursor starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between OpenAGI and Cursor?

OpenAGI — "Orchestrate diverse AI agents for complex, multi-domain problem-solving.". Cursor — "Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use OpenAGI and Cursor together?

Explore Alternatives

OpenAGI Alternatives

Tools similar to OpenAGI

Cursor Alternatives

Tools similar to Cursor

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.