Does OpenAGI or Trigger.dev have a free plan?

OpenAGI is a paid tool. Trigger.dev is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

OpenAGI vs Trigger.dev

Q: Can I use OpenAGI and Trigger.dev together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine OpenAGI and Trigger.dev with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated June 2026

OpenAGI

Rutgers University

Orchestrate diverse AI agents for complex, multi-domain problem-solving.

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

83% data quality

Trigger.dev

API Hero Ltd

Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows in TypeScript

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

94% data quality

Trust & Reliability

OpenAGI

Trust data not available yet

Trigger.dev

Uptime:99%Status page

Users:10K-100K

Customers (per vendor):Supabase, Magic Patterns, MagicSchool AI +7

GDPR

Overall Winner: Trigger.dev

8.2/10 vs OpenAGI at 5.7/10

Leads in:

Output Quality

Customizability

Support

AI Comparison Summary

OpenAGI

5.7

avg score

Trigger.dev

8.2

avg score

Trigger.dev leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Output Quality and 3 more.

OpenAGI has an edge in Value for Money.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Trigger.dev

8.2 / 10

OpenAGI

Best For

Building advanced AI agent systems for research

Experimenting with multi-agent collaboration

Developing autonomous problem-solving agents

Researchers exploring agentic AI architectures

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking a no-code solution

Production-critical applications without dedicated support

Simple, single-step automation tasks

Trigger.dev

Best For

Building production-ready AI agents for developers

Orchestrating complex multi-step AI workflows

Automating long-running background jobs without timeouts

Integrating AI capabilities into existing TypeScript applications

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking a no-code workflow builder

Teams requiring deterministic replay across multiple programming languages (e.g., Go, Java, Python, Ruby, Swift)

Simple, single-step automation tasks that don't require durability or complex orchestration

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

OpenAGI is best for

🤖Automation & Agents7.7

Trigger.dev is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.7

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

OpenAGI

Pros

Open-source and extensible for customization
Designed for advanced AI research and experimentation
Supports orchestration of diverse, specialized agents
Community-driven development and support

Cons

Requires strong technical and AI research expertise
May lack enterprise-grade features and support
Steep learning curve for beginners
Limited pre-built integrations without custom development

Trigger.dev

Pros

Open-source and self-hostable with Apache 2.0 license
TypeScript-native development experience with minimal boilerplate
Managed infrastructure handles scaling, retries, and queues automatically
Comprehensive observability and monitoring with real-time tracing
Supports human-in-the-loop workflows and real-time frontend updates
Flexible build extensions for custom tooling and system packages

Cons

Primarily focused on TypeScript, less native support for other languages compared to alternatives
Requires coding knowledge; no visual builder for non-developers
Managed service incurs usage-based costs beyond free tier
Not designed for polyglot enterprise orchestration requiring deterministic replay across many languages

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

OpenAGI

5.7

/ 10

Trigger.dev

8.2

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

OpenAGI

3.0

Trigger.dev

7.0▲ +4.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

OpenAGI

7.0

Trigger.dev

9.0▲ +2.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

OpenAGI

10.0▲ +2.0

Trigger.dev

8.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

OpenAGI

7.0

Trigger.dev

9.0▲ +2.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

OpenAGI

6.0

Trigger.dev

8.0▲ +2.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

OpenAGI

1.0

Trigger.dev

8.0▲ +7.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, OpenAGI or Trigger.dev?

Both are strong options. OpenAGI has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Trigger.dev has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is OpenAGI cheaper than Trigger.dev?

OpenAGI starts at free (open_source model). Trigger.dev starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between OpenAGI and Trigger.dev?

OpenAGI — "Orchestrate diverse AI agents for complex, multi-domain problem-solving.". Trigger.dev — "Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows in TypeScript". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use OpenAGI and Trigger.dev together?

Explore Alternatives

OpenAGI Alternatives

Tools similar to OpenAGI

Trigger.dev Alternatives

Tools similar to Trigger.dev

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.