Does Phind or Typesense have a free plan?

Phind is available for free. Typesense is a paid tool. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Phind vs Typesense

Q: Can I use Phind and Typesense together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Phind and Typesense with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated May 2026

Phind

Phind Inc

The AI search engine for developers that answers technical questions.

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

84% data quality

Typesense

Typesense, Inc.

Lightning-fast, open-source search engine for instant, relevant results.

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

86% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Phind

Trust data not available yet

Typesense

Users:500M+

Customers (per vendor):Codecademy, Logitech, Kick.com +6

Overall Winner: Typesense

7.8/10 vs Phind at 5.3/10

Leads in:

Output Quality

Support

Integrations

AI Comparison Summary

Phind

5.3

avg score

Typesense

7.8

avg score

Typesense leads overall — particularly in Customizability and Support & Ecosystem and 1 more.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Typesense

7.8 / 10

Phind

Best For

Getting quick code answers

Debugging programming issues

Learning new technical concepts

Researching software development topics

Not Ideal For

General web browsing and non-technical searches

In-depth academic research requiring primary sources

Visual content discovery or image search

Typesense

Best For

Building instant search-as-you-type experiences

Implementing faceted navigation for e-commerce

Adding geo-search capabilities to applications

Creating semantic search for content platforms

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users needing a plug-and-play search solution without development

Organizations requiring a fully managed, no-code search solution

Users who prefer a GUI-only interface for search configuration

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Phind is best for

🔍Research7.7🤖Automation & Agents7.0💬Chat & Conversation6.0

Typesense is best for

🔍Research3.7

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Phind

Pros

Provides direct, concise answers to technical questions
Generates code examples and explanations
Faster than traditional search for coding problems
Tailored for developers and engineers

Cons

May not be suitable for non-technical searches
Accuracy can vary for highly niche or new topics
Limited to information available in its training data or indexed web

Typesense

Pros

Open-source with a permissive license (GPL-3.0)
Extremely fast search performance (sub-50ms)
Developer-friendly with extensive API libraries for multiple languages
Includes advanced features like vector and semantic search
Offers both self-hosted and managed cloud deployment options
Strong community support via Slack and GitHub

Cons

Requires technical expertise for self-hosting and management
May have a learning curve for those new to search engines
Cloud version has usage-based pricing beyond the free tier
No explicit mention of advanced enterprise features like SCIM provisioning

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Phind

5.3

/ 10

Typesense

7.8

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Phind

7.0

Typesense

7.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Phind

8.0

Typesense

9.0▲ +1.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Phind

8.0

Typesense

8.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Phind

2.0

Typesense

7.0▲ +5.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Phind

6.0

Typesense

8.0▲ +2.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Phind

1.0

Typesense

8.0▲ +7.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Phind

Task

Typesense

8.0

Search Accuracy

9.0

Answer Extraction

2.0

8.0

Source Attribution

1.0

8.0

Real Time Indexing

8.0

9.0

Semantic Understanding

9.0

7.0

Multi Modal Search

1.0

5.0

Filter Refinement

9.0

6.0

Personalization

3.0

2.0

Content Detection

1.0

6.0

Knowledge Graph

2.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Phind or Typesense?

Both are strong options. Phind has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Typesense has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Phind cheaper than Typesense?

Phind starts at free (freemium model). Typesense starts at free (open_source model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Phind and Typesense?

Phind — "The AI search engine for developers that answers technical questions.". Typesense — "Lightning-fast, open-source search engine for instant, relevant results.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Phind and Typesense together?

Explore Alternatives

Phind Alternatives

Tools similar to Phind

Typesense Alternatives

Tools similar to Typesense

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.