Does Plandex or Devin have a free plan?

Plandex is a paid tool. Devin is a paid tool. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Plandex vs Devin

Q: Can I use Plandex and Devin together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Plandex and Devin with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated May 2026

Plandex

Build real-world software with AI, designed for large projects and complex tasks.

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

88% data quality

Devin

Cognition Labs

Crush your backlog with your personal AI engineering team.

0.0(0)

PAID

92% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Plandex

Users:10K-100K

GDPR

Devin

Users:10K-100K

Overall Winner: Devin

7.7/10 vs Plandex at 6.0/10

Leads in:

Output Quality

Customizability

Integrations

AI Comparison Summary

Plandex

6.0

avg score

Devin

7.7

avg score

Devin leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Customizability.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Devin

7.7 / 10

Plandex

Best For

Software developers working on large codebases

Engineers needing robust AI assistance for complex tasks

Teams building entire features and applications with AI

Users requiring granular control over AI agent actions

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users or those uncomfortable with command-line interfaces

Individuals seeking a fully managed, cloud-hosted AI coding solution

Projects that require a visual development environment or IDE integration

Devin

Best For

Software development teams

Engineering managers

Organizations with large codebases

Companies undergoing code migrations

Not Ideal For

Highly creative design tasks without clear technical specifications

Projects requiring deep human intuition or subjective judgment

Real-time pair programming where immediate, conversational feedback is paramount

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Plandex is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🤖Automation & Agents7.0

Devin is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🔍Research9.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Plandex

Pros

Open source and community-driven
Designed for large-scale projects and files
Offers flexible autonomy levels
Supports multiple AI models to avoid vendor lock-in
Includes a diff review sandbox for isolated changes
Terminal-based workflow is familiar to developers

Cons

Requires command-line proficiency
No graphical user interface (GUI) available
Plandex Cloud service is winding down, focusing solely on self-hosted
May have a learning curve for new users unfamiliar with AI agents
Relies on external AI models, incurring their respective costs

Devin

Pros

Significantly increases engineering efficiency
Reduces development costs
Automates repetitive and monotonous coding tasks
Learns and adapts to specific codebases
Integrates with popular developer tools
Supports collaborative workflows
Enhances code quality through automated testing

Cons

Requires human oversight for final approval
May require initial fine-tuning for highly specialized tasks
Not suitable for highly creative or ambiguous problem-solving
Reliance on cloud infrastructure for core functionality

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Plandex

6.0

/ 10

Devin

7.7

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Plandex

4.0

Devin

7.0▲ +3.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Plandex

7.0

Devin

8.0▲ +1.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Plandex

8.0

Devin

8.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Plandex

4.0

Devin

8.0▲ +4.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Plandex

6.0

Devin

7.0▲ +1.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Plandex

7.0

Devin

8.0▲ +1.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Plandex

Task

Devin

7.0

Code Completion

7.0

8.0

Bug Detection

8.0

7.0

Code Explanation

7.0

Refactoring

9.0

6.0

Test Generation

8.0

7.0

Multi Language Support

7.0

9.0

Context Understanding

9.0

6.0

Documentation Generation

7.0

Performance Optimization

8.0

5.0

Security Scanning

6.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Plandex or Devin?

Both are strong options. Plandex has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Devin has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Plandex cheaper than Devin?

Plandex starts at free (open_source model). Devin starts at $20/month (paid model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Plandex and Devin?

Plandex — "Build real-world software with AI, designed for large projects and complex tasks.". Devin — "Crush your backlog with your personal AI engineering team.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Plandex and Devin together?

Explore Alternatives

Plandex Alternatives

Tools similar to Plandex

Devin Alternatives

Tools similar to Devin

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.