Launching soon — get early access:

SWE-agent vs Amp (Sourcegraph)

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated October 2026
SWE-agent logo

SWE-agent

Princeton University

Open-source autonomous agent for GitHub issues & coding challenges

Open Source
75% verification coverage
VS
Amp (Sourcegraph) logo

Amp (Sourcegraph)

Sourcegraph

The frontier coding agent — web, terminal & phone

Freemium
83% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

SWE-agent

Users:10K-100K

Amp (Sourcegraph)

Uptime:99.39% (90-day)Status page
Users:1M-10M
Customers (per vendor):Reddit, MathWorks, Leidos +7
GDPR
SOC 2

Overall Winner: Amp (Sourcegraph)

5.9/10 vs SWE-agent at 4.7/10

Leads in:
Planning Quality
Integration
Ease of Use

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

SWE-agent

4.7

avg score

Amp (Sourcegraph)

5.9

avg score

Amp (Sourcegraph) leads overall — particularly in Integration and Planning Quality.

Based on 7 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Amp (Sourcegraph)

5.9 / 10

SWE-agent

Best For
Researchers and developers building autonomous coding agents
Engineering teams automating bug fixes in GitHub repositories
Cybersecurity professionals identifying vulnerabilities with AI
Academics and students exploring agentic AI for software engineering

Amp (Sourcegraph)

Best For
Developers running several long-lived agents in parallel without local worktrees or port conflicts
Teams that want agents to wake on outside events like a new Linear issue or CI failing on main
Developers who want to review agent changes and preview the running app from any device
Teams collaborating on the same agent session together via multiplayer orbs

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

SWE-agent is best for

✍️Writing & Content8.0💬Chat & Conversation8.0🎧Customer Support7.0

Amp (Sourcegraph) is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🔍Research9.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

SWE-agentSWE-agent

Cons

  • SWE-agent is now in maintenance-only mode, with development focused on mini-swe-agent
  • Requires a language model of choice (e.g., GPT-4o or Claude Sonnet 4) to function
Amp (Sourcegraph)Amp (Sourcegraph)

Cons

No cons listed yet.

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5
Customization5
Support5
Integration5
Compliance & Data Protection5
Performance5
Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Ease of UseCustomizationSupportIntegrationCompliancePerformancePlanning

SWE-agent

4.7

/ 10

Amp (Sourcegraph)

5.9

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

AI

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

SWE-agent
2.0
Amp (Sourcegraph)
3.0▲ +1.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

SWE-agent
7.0
Amp (Sourcegraph)
7.0

Support

AI

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

SWE-agent
6.0▲ +1.0
Amp (Sourcegraph)
5.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

SWE-agent
2.0
Amp (Sourcegraph)
7.0▲ +5.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

SWE-agent
5.0
Amp (Sourcegraph)
5.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

SWE-agent
5.0
Amp (Sourcegraph)
5.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

SWE-agent
6.0
Amp (Sourcegraph)
9.0▲ +3.0

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

SWE-agent

Task

Amp (Sourcegraph)

2.0
Code Completion
2.0
8.0
Bug Detection
9.0
4.0
Code Explanation
9.0
5.0
Refactoring
9.0
6.0
Test Generation
8.0
6.0
Multi Language Support
8.0
8.0
Context Understanding
9.0
3.0
Documentation Generation
7.0
4.0
Performance Optimization
5.0
6.0
Security Scanning
4.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, SWE-agent or Amp (Sourcegraph)?
Both are strong options. SWE-agent is a strong choice, while Amp (Sourcegraph) is a strong choice. The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is SWE-agent cheaper than Amp (Sourcegraph)?
SWE-agent starts at free (open_source model). Amp (Sourcegraph) starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between SWE-agent and Amp (Sourcegraph)?
SWE-agent — "Open-source autonomous agent for GitHub issues & coding challenges". Amp (Sourcegraph) — "The frontier coding agent — web, terminal & phone". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.
Can I use SWE-agent and Amp (Sourcegraph) together?
Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine SWE-agent and Amp (Sourcegraph) with other tools and save your AI toolkit.
Does SWE-agent or Amp (Sourcegraph) have a free plan?
SWE-agent is a paid tool. Amp (Sourcegraph) is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.