Does SWE-agent or Goose have a free plan?

SWE-agent is a paid tool. Goose is a paid tool. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

SWE-agent vs Goose

Q: Can I use SWE-agent and Goose together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine SWE-agent and Goose with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated July 2026

SWE-agent

Princeton University

Autonomously fix GitHub issues and perform coding tasks with your preferred language model.

0.0(0)

Open Source

84% verification coverage

Goose

Block

An extensible AI agent for code generation, execution, editing, and testing with any LLM.

0.0(0)

Open Source

86% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

SWE-agent

Trust data not available yet

Goose

Users:10K-100K

Too Close to Call

SWE-agent (6.3) vs Goose (6.0) — difference of 0.3 points

AI Comparison Summary

SWE-agent

6.3

avg score

Goose

6.0

avg score

Both tools score very similarly overall — the best choice depends on your specific priorities.

Based on 12 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Too close to call — it's a tie

SWE-agent

Best For

Software developers automating bug fixes

Researchers in AI and software engineering

Cybersecurity professionals for vulnerability detection

Teams solving competitive coding challenges

Consider Alternatives If

Non-technical users seeking a no-code solution

Simple text generation or content creation tasks

Real-time customer support or conversational AI

Goose

Best For

Developers seeking autonomous coding assistance

Teams needing flexible, customizable AI coding agents

Users who want to integrate their preferred LLMs into development workflows

Open-source enthusiasts and contributors

Consider Alternatives If

Non-technical users seeking a no-code solution

Teams requiring extensive enterprise-grade support and compliance out-of-the-box

Users looking for a fully managed cloud service

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

SWE-agent is best for

✍️Writing & Content8.0💬Chat & Conversation8.0🔍Research7.0

Goose is best for

🤖Automation & Agents7.0🔍Research7.0🎧Customer Support7.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

SWE-agent

Pros

Achieves state-of-the-art performance on SWE-bench
Offers high flexibility with choice of language models
Fully configurable through a single YAML file
Designed for research, making it simple and hackable
Supports multimodal input for processing images in issues
Open-source with an active community

Cons

Currently in maintenance-only mode, superseded by mini-swe-agent
Requires technical expertise for setup and configuration
Performance is dependent on the chosen language model
Not a plug-and-play solution for non-developers
May require human oversight for critical code changes

Goose

Pros

Open-source and extensible
Model-agnostic (supports any LLM)
Comprehensive code development lifecycle support (install, execute, edit, test)
Available as desktop app and CLI for flexible deployment
Supports multi-agent capabilities
Built with Rust for performance

Cons

Limited information on advanced features and integrations
Requires technical expertise for setup and customization
No explicit cloud-hosted option mentioned
Community-driven support might be less structured than commercial offerings
Steep learning curve for beginners

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Accuracy & Reliability5

Safety & Alignment5

Performance5

Task Completion5

Tool Use Correctness5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

SWE-agent

6.3

/ 10

Your pick

Goose

6.0

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

SWE-agent

3.0

Goose

4.0▲ +1.0

Output Quality

How accurate, reliable, and useful are the outputs this product generates?

SWE-agent

7.0

Goose

7.0

Value for Money

How well does the pricing match the features and output quality delivered?

SWE-agent

10.0

Goose

10.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

SWE-agent

7.0▲ +2.0

Goose

5.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

SWE-agent

7.0▲ +1.0

Goose

6.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

SWE-agent

4.0

Goose

4.0

Accuracy & Reliability

Factual accuracy and hallucination resistance

SWE-agent

—

Goose

—

Safety & Alignment

Calculated

Bias mitigation, content filtering, harmful-output prevention

SWE-agent

—

Goose

—

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

SWE-agent

—

Goose

—

Task Completion

End-to-end task success rate

SWE-agent

—

Goose

—

Tool Use Correctness

Picks the correct tool + correct arguments

SWE-agent

—

Goose

—

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

SWE-agent

—

Goose

—

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

SWE-agent

Task

Goose

6.0

Code Completion

7.0

8.0

Bug Detection

6.0

7.0

Code Explanation

7.0

Refactoring

7.0

6.0

Test Generation

8.0

5.0

Multi Language Support

7.0

8.0

Context Understanding

6.0

7.0

Documentation Generation

5.0

7.0

Performance Optimization

6.0

8.0

Security Scanning

4.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, SWE-agent or Goose?

Both are strong options. SWE-agent has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Goose has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is SWE-agent cheaper than Goose?

SWE-agent starts at free (open_source model). Goose starts at free (open_source model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between SWE-agent and Goose?

SWE-agent — "Autonomously fix GitHub issues and perform coding tasks with your preferred language model.". Goose — "An extensible AI agent for code generation, execution, editing, and testing with any LLM.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use SWE-agent and Goose together?

Explore Alternatives

SWE-agent Alternatives

Tools similar to SWE-agent

Goose Alternatives

Tools similar to Goose

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.