Trigger.dev vs Trunk.io
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Updated June 2026
Trust & Reliability
Trigger.dev
Users:10K-100K
Customers (per vendor):Supabase, Magic Patterns, MagicSchool AI +7
GDPR
Overall Winner: Trigger.dev
8.2/10 vs Trunk.io at 7.5/10
Leads in:
Output Quality
Customizability
Value for Money
AI Comparison Summary
Trigger.dev
8.2
avg score
Trunk.io
7.5
avg score
Trigger.dev leads overall — particularly in Customizability.
Based on 6 dimensions
How scores are calculatedOverall Winner
Trigger.dev
8.2 / 10
Trigger.dev
Best For
Building production-ready AI agents for developers
Orchestrating complex multi-step AI workflows
Automating long-running background jobs without timeouts
Integrating AI capabilities into existing TypeScript applications
Not Ideal For
Non-technical users seeking a no-code workflow builder
Teams requiring deterministic replay across multiple programming languages (e.g., Go, Java, Python, Ruby, Swift)
Simple, single-step automation tasks that don't require durability or complex orchestration
Trunk.io
Best For
Eliminating flaky tests in CI pipelines for engineering teams
Accelerating code merges and maintaining main branch stability
Optimizing CI costs and developer productivity in monorepos
Automating root cause analysis for test failures
Not Ideal For
Teams without existing CI/CD pipelines
Non-technical users seeking a no-code solution for software development
Small projects with very low code churn and minimal testing needs
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
Trigger.dev is best for
🤖Automation & Agents8.7
Trunk.io is best for
💻Coding & Dev9.0🤖Automation & Agents8.0📊Data & Analytics7.0
Filter by your use case:
Pros & Cons
Trigger.devPros
- Open-source and self-hostable with Apache 2.0 license
- TypeScript-native development experience with minimal boilerplate
- Managed infrastructure handles scaling, retries, and queues automatically
- Comprehensive observability and monitoring with real-time tracing
- Supports human-in-the-loop workflows and real-time frontend updates
- Flexible build extensions for custom tooling and system packages
Cons
- Primarily focused on TypeScript, less native support for other languages compared to alternatives
- Requires coding knowledge; no visual builder for non-developers
- Managed service incurs usage-based costs beyond free tier
- Not designed for polyglot enterprise orchestration requiring deterministic replay across many languages
Trunk.ioPros
- Automatically detects and quarantines flaky tests, preventing CI blockages
- Advanced merge queue features like parallelization and intelligent batching drastically reduce merge times
- AI-powered failure analysis provides quick insights into test issues
- Seamless integration with GitHub, Slack, Jira, and Linear streamlines workflows
- Supports any language, test runner, and CI provider, offering high flexibility
- Offers on-premise deployment for Enterprise customers, enhancing data control
- Free tier available for open-source projects and small teams
Cons
- Requires integration with existing CI/CD pipelines, which may involve initial setup
- Advanced features like on-premise deployment and custom integrations are limited to Enterprise plans
- AI-powered analysis, while helpful, may still require human oversight for complex issues
- Focuses primarily on CI/CD and test reliability, not a full-suite DevOps platform
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Ease of Use5
Output Quality5
Value for Money5
Customizability5
Support & Ecosystem5
Integration Power5
Dimension Comparison
Trigger.dev
8.2
/ 10
Your pick
Trunk.io
7.5
/ 10
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow easy it is to get started and use daily
Trigger.dev
7.0
Trunk.io
7.0
Output Quality
AIQuality and accuracy of generated results
Trigger.dev
9.0▲ +1.0
Trunk.io
8.0
Value for Money
AICost vs. features and output quality
Trigger.dev
8.0▲ +1.0
Trunk.io
7.0
Customizability
CalculatedAbility to tailor to specific needs
Trigger.dev
9.0▲ +2.0
Trunk.io
7.0
Support & Ecosystem
AIDocumentation, community, and support quality
Trigger.dev
8.0
Trunk.io
8.0
Integration Power
CalculatedAbility to connect with other tools and workflows
Trigger.dev
8.0
Trunk.io
8.0
Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Trigger.dev or Trunk.io?
Both are strong options. Trigger.dev has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Trunk.io has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is Trigger.dev cheaper than Trunk.io?
Trigger.dev starts at free (freemium model). Trunk.io starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between Trigger.dev and Trunk.io?
Trigger.dev — "Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows in TypeScript". Trunk.io — "Keep CI Green: Eliminate flaky tests and merge bottlenecks". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.