Rasa vs Trigger.dev
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Updated May 2026
Trust & Reliability
Rasa
Customers (per vendor):Autodesk, Groupe IMA, Swisscom +7
GDPR
HIPAA
Trigger.dev
Overall Winner: Trigger.dev
8.2/10 vs Rasa at 7.5/10
Leads in:
Output Quality
Value for Money
Integrations
AI Comparison Summary
Rasa
7.5
avg score
Trigger.dev
8.2
avg score
Trigger.dev leads overall.
Based on 6 dimensions
How scores are calculatedOverall Winner
Trigger.dev
8.2 / 10
Rasa
Best For
Building high-trust AI agents for customer support
Automating sales enablement processes
Enhancing operational efficiency with internal AI agents
Developing secure and compliant AI experiences for regulated industries
Not Ideal For
Non-technical users seeking a simple, out-of-the-box chatbot solution
Individuals or small teams without development resources for self-hosting
Users looking for a fully managed SaaS solution without any infrastructure involvement
Trigger.dev
Best For
Building production-ready AI agents for developers
Orchestrating complex multi-step AI workflows
Automating long-running background jobs without timeouts
Integrating AI capabilities into existing TypeScript applications
Not Ideal For
Non-technical users seeking a no-code workflow builder
Teams requiring deterministic replay across multiple programming languages (e.g., Go, Java, Python, Ruby, Swift)
Simple, single-step automation tasks that don't require durability or complex orchestration
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
Rasa is best for
✍️Writing & Content8.0💬Chat & Conversation8.0🤖Automation & Agents8.0
Trigger.dev is best for
🤖Automation & Agents8.7
Filter by your use case:
Pros & Cons
RasaPros
- Provides full control over AI agent behavior and performance
- Supports deployment on-premise or in private cloud for data sovereignty
- Offers a flexible development experience for technical and business teams
- Enables faster responses and cost-efficient operations compared to LLM-first frameworks
- Includes enterprise-grade security features like PII data management and secrets management
- Open-source core allows for extensive customization and community support
Cons
- Requires technical expertise for advanced customization and deployment
- Enterprise features and premium support require a paid subscription
- No explicit mention of a visual drag-and-drop interface for non-technical users in the core platform
- Limited to conversational AI use cases, not a general-purpose AI platform
- No explicit mention of specific LLM models included, users bring their own
Trigger.devPros
- Open-source and self-hostable with Apache 2.0 license
- TypeScript-native development experience with minimal boilerplate
- Managed infrastructure handles scaling, retries, and queues automatically
- Comprehensive observability and monitoring with real-time tracing
- Supports human-in-the-loop workflows and real-time frontend updates
- Flexible build extensions for custom tooling and system packages
Cons
- Primarily focused on TypeScript, less native support for other languages compared to alternatives
- Requires coding knowledge; no visual builder for non-developers
- Managed service incurs usage-based costs beyond free tier
- Not designed for polyglot enterprise orchestration requiring deterministic replay across many languages
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Ease of Use5
Output Quality5
Value for Money5
Customizability5
Support & Ecosystem5
Integration Power5
Dimension Comparison
Rasa
7.5
/ 10
Trigger.dev
8.2
/ 10
Your pick
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow easy it is to get started and use daily
Rasa
6.0
Trigger.dev
7.0▲ +1.0
Output Quality
AIQuality and accuracy of generated results
Rasa
8.0
Trigger.dev
9.0▲ +1.0
Value for Money
AICost vs. features and output quality
Rasa
7.0
Trigger.dev
8.0▲ +1.0
Customizability
CalculatedAbility to tailor to specific needs
Rasa
9.0
Trigger.dev
9.0
Support & Ecosystem
AIDocumentation, community, and support quality
Rasa
8.0
Trigger.dev
8.0
Integration Power
CalculatedAbility to connect with other tools and workflows
Rasa
7.0
Trigger.dev
8.0▲ +1.0
Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Rasa or Trigger.dev?
Both are strong options. Rasa has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Trigger.dev has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is Rasa cheaper than Trigger.dev?
Rasa starts at free (open_source model). Trigger.dev starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between Rasa and Trigger.dev?
Rasa — "Build AI agents you can trust to handle real world complexity". Trigger.dev — "Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows in TypeScript". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.