SuperAGI vs Rasa
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Updated June 2026
Trust & Reliability
SuperAGI
Users:10K-100K
Customers (per vendor):Firecrawl, Agora, SpatialChat +7
GDPR
SOC 2
Overall Winner: Rasa
7.5/10 vs SuperAGI at 6.5/10
Leads in:
Customizability
Output Quality
Support
AI Comparison Summary
SuperAGI
6.5
avg score
Rasa
7.5
avg score
Rasa leads overall — particularly in Support & Ecosystem.
Based on 6 dimensions
How scores are calculatedOverall Winner
Rasa
7.5 / 10
SuperAGI
Best For
Automating sales prospecting and outreach for sales teams
Orchestrating multi-channel marketing campaigns for marketers
Delivering instant customer support with AI agents
Streamlining project management and task tracking
Not Ideal For
Users seeking a purely no-code agent builder for highly custom logic
Organizations with strict on-premise-only deployment requirements
Individuals needing a simple, single-purpose AI assistant without broader business applications
Rasa
Best For
Building high-trust AI agents for customer support
Automating sales enablement processes
Enhancing operational efficiency with internal AI agents
Developing secure and compliant AI experiences for regulated industries
Not Ideal For
Non-technical users seeking a simple, out-of-the-box chatbot solution
Individuals or small teams without development resources for self-hosting
Users looking for a fully managed SaaS solution without any infrastructure involvement
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
SuperAGI is best for
🤖Automation & Agents7.3
Rasa is best for
✍️Writing & Content8.0💬Chat & Conversation8.0🤖Automation & Agents8.0
Filter by your use case:
Pros & Cons
SuperAGIPros
- Consolidates over 50 AI-native apps and agents into a single platform
- Supports continuous learning and adaptation through reinforcement learning
- Offers a comprehensive suite of tools for sales, marketing, and customer support
- Provides mobile apps (Android, iOS) and a Chrome extension for on-the-go management
- Features autonomous AI agents that think, act, execute, and improve
- Offers enterprise-grade security and compliance (GDPR, SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO)
Cons
- Requires purchasing credits for usage beyond the free tier
- The core framework is developer-focused, requiring technical expertise for advanced customization
- Some advanced features like CPQ and I Live Assist are listed as 'Coming Soon'
- No explicit mention of a visual workflow builder for non-technical users for complex automations
RasaPros
- Provides full control over AI agent behavior and performance
- Supports deployment on-premise or in private cloud for data sovereignty
- Offers a flexible development experience for technical and business teams
- Enables faster responses and cost-efficient operations compared to LLM-first frameworks
- Includes enterprise-grade security features like PII data management and secrets management
- Open-source core allows for extensive customization and community support
Cons
- Requires technical expertise for advanced customization and deployment
- Enterprise features and premium support require a paid subscription
- No explicit mention of a visual drag-and-drop interface for non-technical users in the core platform
- Limited to conversational AI use cases, not a general-purpose AI platform
- No explicit mention of specific LLM models included, users bring their own
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Ease of Use5
Output Quality5
Value for Money5
Customizability5
Support & Ecosystem5
Integration Power5
Dimension Comparison
SuperAGI
6.5
/ 10
Rasa
7.5
/ 10
Clear winner
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow easy it is to get started and use daily
SuperAGI
5.0
Rasa
6.0▲ +1.0
Output Quality
AIQuality and accuracy of generated results
SuperAGI
7.0
Rasa
8.0▲ +1.0
Value for Money
AICost vs. features and output quality
SuperAGI
7.0
Rasa
7.0
Customizability
CalculatedAbility to tailor to specific needs
SuperAGI
8.0
Rasa
9.0▲ +1.0
Support & Ecosystem
AIDocumentation, community, and support quality
SuperAGI
6.0
Rasa
8.0▲ +2.0
Integration Power
CalculatedAbility to connect with other tools and workflows
SuperAGI
6.0
Rasa
7.0▲ +1.0
Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, SuperAGI or Rasa?
Both are strong options. SuperAGI has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Rasa has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is SuperAGI cheaper than Rasa?
SuperAGI starts at $50/month (open_source model). Rasa starts at free (open_source model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between SuperAGI and Rasa?
SuperAGI — "Supercharge your business with digital workers and agentic software". Rasa — "Build AI agents you can trust to handle real world complexity". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.